Starting Contemporary Analysis

Contemporary Analysis

Contemporary Analysis was founded on the premise that there is always a better way. In fact, we exist to help you find better ways to work smart. We do this using a methodology called predictive analytics.
Predictive analytics involves collecting data about your business and customers, and then applying theory and math to build simple systems to help you work more effectively and efficiently.
Our systems are tailored to fit your company no matter how big or small or what industry you are in. We have built simple systems for fast-growing technology companies, Fortune 500 companies as well as small companies in a variety of industries including community colleges, insurance companies, software companies and engineering firms.
This video is the story of how I was first introduced to entrepreneurship and predictive analytics, and my journey from running a landscaping company to being the CEO of Contemporary Analysis.  I decided to make this my first video post.  I tell this story often, because it helps to illustrate CAN‘s mission of making the benefits of predictive analytics accessible to both landscaping and Fortune 500 companies.

Don't Just Count, Measure

The United States faces a shortage of 140,000 to 190,000 people with deep analytical skills and 1.5 million managers and analysts to analyze data and make decisions based on their findings. — Big Data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity

Measurement can be defined as a quantitatively expressed reduction of uncertainty based on one or more observations, while counting is to determine the exact number or amount of something.  Executives have become obsessed with counting; they track everything from inventory, hours worked vs. hours billed, number of Facebook fans, website visitors and much more.  It is easy to like counting, because it is familiar and exact. However, it is time to move beyond counting, and start measuring. (more…)

Simple Science vs. Complex Science

Science is the systematic study of a phenomenon that includes observation and experimentation to explain and understand why things happen.  We can use science to explain almost everything in our universe from the effects of gravity to the impact on sales of your latest marketing campaign.  However, it is important to understand that there are two types of sciences, simple and complex, and that the answers they produce are different. (more…)

Focus on the Business Question, not the Technology

This post is part of a series of interviews with experts in business intelligence, sales management, marketing, customer retention, management and strategic planning.  Everyday, the CAN team interacts clients, mentors, and friends who are leaders in their fields, and we started this series to share their expertise.
Corporate business intelligence has hit a roadblock, according to Cameron Ludwig, the Director of Analytics at BlueCross BlueShield of Nebraska. “As a discipline, we have been more enamored about what we can do, and not what we should do”.  Business intelligence of tomorrow needs to put less focus on technical capabilities, and instead, emphasize designing solutions that focus on answering essential business questions.  This need for a shift in focus is due to the exponential increases in data availability and the increasing reliance of executives on data in their decision making.  For example, in a recent study by McKinsey there is a projected 40% growth rate in the amount of new data generated per year, with many companies having hundreds of terabytes of data (link).  As a discipline, business intelligence  has matured to the point where we need to move beyond collecting and displaying of data.  It is time to shift to the next level.
“Now the knowledge is taking the place of capital as the driving force in organizations worldwide, it is all too easy to confuse data with knowledge and information technology with information.”- Peter Drucker, 2005
In order for BI to make the transition from what is technically possible, what we can do, toward what is valued by business, what we should do, requires a shift in focus for the emerging field of data science.  Although I am hesitant to say that data scientists should study business at the exclusion of technology, this shift requires that data scientists become students of business as opposed to technology.  That is, their greatest value comes from studying technology to the point of knowing what is possible and how to apply technology to meet the needs of their end users.  For example when a contractor builds a house, he doesn’t study the hammer, he studies architectural plans and creates a finished product from raw materials.  The same goes for data scientists; they should focus on understanding the problems that need to be solved, then spend time studying how to use raw materials (data) to create a valuable finished product.
Keeping with the need for a shift in the field of business intelligence from technology to application, the valuable finished product is not a dashboard displaying metrics, but rather actionable intelligence focused on answering the business questions of the end user.  This renewed focus of business intelligence requires that BI only provides decision makers with what is essential to answer their questions.  All the slick user-interfaces, gauges and dials of flashy dashboards will never provide as much value as the algorithm behind an executive report that integrates ten different historical and environmental variables to advise which projects to bid on, including anticipated profit margins.
Tremendous value exists in the proper application of data science, but the maximum value comes from a deep understanding of the needs and objectives of the end user.  Ensuring that the end product fits the end user requires the right feedback, and at least as much criticism as creation.  When self- and peer-reviewing their work, Cameron recommends that data scientists should be required to justify the existence of each sentence, idea, graph, and model.  This requires each BI report to be designed with simplicity in mind, but also maximizes value to the end user and builds trust in BI by focusing only on that which contributes to solving the problem at hand.  If an artifact, tool or feature cannot be defended, it is most likely of little value and should be eliminated.  In order for business intelligence to contribute maximum value to the organization, every element of business intelligence must justify its existence.
“Capital importance of criticism in the work of creation itself.  Probably, indeed, the larger part of the labour of an author (programmer) in composing his work is critical labour; the labour of sifting, combining, constructing, expunging, correcting, testing: this frightful toil is as much critical as creative”- T.S. Eliot

Go Beyond Metrics

Often, our clients come to us believing that they already apply analytics to their business, when in fact, they are actually doing a fantastic job at applying metrics.  Metrics provide measurements of variables, while analytics explain the relationships between variables.  Although both metrics and analytics work together to provide you with the insights necessary to grow your business, metrics and analytics are not synonyms.  To date, metrics have dominated the business intelligence field in the form of dashboards and scorecards.  Dashboards display metrics as the measurement of key variables. For this reason, they are very useful for monitoring current business activities and results.  While metrics are still very important, analytics goes beyond measurement to provide explanations of the deep relationships behind business metrics.  Instead of reporting that something happened, analytics seeks to explain why something happened, when events can be expected to occur, and how we should act to create certain desirable outcomes.
The shift towards analytics is growing in importance because today’s executives need to be able to scale their decision-making in an increasingly complex world with little room for error.  While many executives understand the value of data-driven decision making, decision-makers can become overwhelmed when faced with the volume and complexity of available data provided by metrics and dashboards.  Analytics provide value to by cutting through the clutter and complexity and providing decision-makers access to the most imports variables, the relationships between variables, and even the accuracy of the analytic model.  When using analytics, executives are able to avoid sorting through non-information, and instead,  focus on the information which drives their best decision-making.

Presenting Business Intelligence

Presenting Business Intelligence
At CAN we spend a lot of time developing better ways to present and communicate our ideas, because our systems only produce results if people understand how to use our insights. Presenting business intelligence is based on the business question, the audience and what is important. The following is an explanation of how we decide how to present:

Select a Business Question

We start every project by defining the business question to be answered.  We do not worry about what techniques or methodology we are going to use to answer the questions.  Instead, we determine what is the most important question to be edited.  We only start a project once our client is able to answer “What question, if answered, would have the largest impact on your business in the next 6 months?”. (Related Post on ROI)

Select an Audience

Who you are presenting to determines what information you present and in what order.  There are three presentation styles, but they depend on who you are talking to.  The graphic above outlines each presentation.
When presenting to generalists you want to start with the conclusion and then explain how you reached that conclusions.  By starting with the conclusion, you provide generalists, who are typically decision makers, a filter to understand and develop questions during the rest of your presentation.
When presenting to experts, you want to start your presentation by providing background information, and then explain step by step how you reached your final conclusion.  This is useful because the experts want to know that you know what you are talking about, and presenting background information before you reach conclusions will help you establish trust with the experts.

Justify Each Element

The best presentations start on time, end early and leave plenty of time for questions.  The key to success is to curate your presentation by justifying the existence of each sentence, graph and data table. If you can not provide a good explanation for something you included in your presentation, you must take it out.

Focus on Results

After a successful presentation, your audience will know exactly what the next step is; who they need to call, what they need to buy and what they need to do.  If there is no clear action they must take after hearing your presentation, then your research and presentation have been wasted.
Learn how you can use business intelligence to make data-driven decisions.

Zombie Marketing: Go from Infection to Infestation

At CAN, we love trying to figure out why things work or don’t work.  This often leads to continuous experimentation.  I decided to unleash this post about Zombie Marketing because it is our latest marketing strategy, it is lethally effective, and, well, it’s about ZOMBIES!

For full-out zombie apocalypse, the key is for the infection to reach critical mass before the authorities are able to exterminate the Differently Animated.  For a Zombie outbreak to take over the world you don’t announce it to the masses. Instead, you infect a few key people and let the virus spread quietly.  In sales and marketing, as with Zombies, the key is to select the right people to contact, but the ‘right people’ aren’t who most would people usually think of.
When most people think about influential people, they tend to focus on the leaders of social groups, people at the center of their social group with many people listening to them.  Although they are the center of their social group, leaders are very difficult people to infect because they typically have a specific platform to protect, and their attention is fragmented because so many people want their attention.  Even if you manage to infect a leader without first reaching an overwhelming critical mass, infecting them won’t have as much impact as if you even had already established a small but concentrated infected user-base.  A prime example of using leaders as infectious agents is when you get a celebrity endorsement for a product with an established user-base, or a celebrity endorsement for a brand new product that no one has ever used.
Instead of infecting leaders, the key to a successful Zombie Marketing strategy is to infect the influencers in a group.  Influencers are people on they edge of many social groups, they don’t have a platform, and they move easily from one social group to the next infecting people with their ideas.  Influencers easily develop horizontal friendships, which are friendships between people with different interests, geographies, races, ages, education backgrounds, income levels, and lifestyles.  People with horizontal friendships are especially valuable because they are constantly being exposed to new ideas, perspectives, products, and people outside of what would be considered their typical sphere of influence. (Check out a related post on the value of horizontal friendships)
Since influencers are infinitely curious and open to new friendships and ideas, I find them quite enjoyable and relatively easy to infect.  However, they require a different method of infection compared to leaders and the masses.  To infect leaders you have to get recognized, with the masses you have to push your message, and with influencers you have to allow them to discover something novel.  People become influencers because they enjoy discovering new, novel and previously undiscovered ideas.

  • Focus Your Content on Solutions to Specific Needs: Influencers enjoy connecting people to solutions to their ideas.  In Zombie Marketing you want to make spreading the infection as easy as possible.  You want influencers to know that if they find someone with a specific need you have the solution.
  • Focus Your Analytics on the Infection: You want your focus to be on developing content that infects influencers, and your content will be guided by the feedback that you receive.  So don’t focus on visits or clicks.  Instead focus on time on site, conversion, comments and loyalty.
  • Provide Consistent Value: When people invest their money or time in something they expect to get consistent results.  If you want people to keep coming back to your site you want to provide them with consistent value.  This doesn’t mean that you have to post everyday, but that if you post once a week you continue to post once a week and preferably on the same day.
  • Promote your Work Sporadically during Off Times: While you need to continually develop great content, promoting your work sporadically and during off times can work in your favor, at least until you gain a significant user base.  Not posting all of your content encourages people to keep checking back in with your website to get the latest updates.  Post during off times, like Friday, Saturday and Sunday night when most people aren’t posting and yet their are still people hungry for new content.
  • Let the Virus Run It Course: In addition to being patient, you need to develop content that is viable over a long period of time.  This means that it should be memorable and solve a need that people will have today, tomorrow and a year+ from now.  That way once you infect someone with your ideas, they are useful and contagious for as long as possible.

Disclaimer: Zombie Marketing might not be for you if you operate in a perfectly competitive market place with many sellers, many buyers and an undifferentiated product.  However, if you operate in a monopolistic competitive market places then a Zombie Marketing strategy might be the right one for you.

Refocusing Business Intelligence on Client Needs not Wants

When my partner, Tadd Wood, and I started Contemporary Analysis we decided that we were going to focus on developing a great final product, instead of focusing offering our products at a low cost or focusing great customer service. Not that our prices or our customer services is lacking, but that they are not our focus. We did this because I learned from owning previous businesses that people care about price before they sign the contract, they care about customer service when the product is being delivered, but once the final product is delivered all they care about is the quality of deliverable.
We identified three key principals that we use when building our final deliverables:

  1. We focus on providing answers to our clients most important business questions.
  2. Our methodology is designed to provide reliable answers to real businesses.
  3. We provide answers to our clients’ questions so that they get immediate tasks to improve their business in addition to greater understanding.

The core of these principals is to focus on our clients needs and not their wants.  This has been really difficult because what our clients need is answers to their business questions. While it is easy to get distracted by flashy tools, cool visualization and interactive interfaces, at the end of the day our client’s just want answers to their business questions. This is why we decided to refocus business intelligence as presented in the business industry.

How to Build an Analytical Culture

CAN was started in 2008, to make predictive analytics applicable and accessible to businesses of almost any size.  To fulfill our mission we have become experts in helping our clients adopt predictive analytics.  The first step in adopting predictive analytics is to start building an analytical culture.  In an analytical culture, people:
Know the Numbers: Everyone should know what is happening and whether certain strategies were successful.  The objective of knowing the numbers is not to judge individuals or the team, but learn from the past and refine future attempts at innovation.
Examine the Numbers: In order to effectively discuss and examine the numbers, team members should be familiar with the numbers, their assumptions, and their application.
Use the Numbers: The ultimate goal of adopting predictive analytics is to make better decisions.  This is the hardest and most complex phase of becoming analytical.  However, when achieved, this stage provides the highest Return on Investment (ROI).  It requires participating members to understand factors driving the numbers, historical paradigm shifts, and the assumptions used to make decisions.  Once the factors and assumptions are understood, they can be utilized properly to optimize processes and predict outcomes of specific decisions.  
The Analytical Portal
The key to building an analytical culture is to make analytics easy to use, understand, and accessible.  The easiest way to do this is to develop an analytical portal.  The purpose of the analytical portal is to allow everyone in your organization to know, examine, and use the numbers without having to contact the accounting and information technology departments every time a report or numbers are needed.  Your analytical portal should allow people to have access to 5 business intelligence tools:
Dashboards will be used to quickly and easily report key metrics.  The key to building successful dashboards is to choose the correct metrics and provide quick and easy access.  Dashboards as well as scorecards will allow team members to see the big picture and drill down into finer details on a need to know basis.  Dashboards differ from slicing & dicing data in that dashboards are predetermined visualizations of key metrics that are the same across individuals and time.
Detailed Reports are to be read before using analytics to make decisions.  These are designed to ensure that statistics, equations, metrics and other reports analytics are fully understood.  This will ensure that recommendations are properly implemented.
Slicing & Dicing Data allows your employees to ask questions about the data and get quick responses.  People should be able to quickly pull any data that they want from a variety of data sources such as the census, economic data, news sources via text mining, social media, surveys, and internal databases.
Predictive Analytics allows your employees to understand the relationship between outcomes and the variables that drive them.  The results of predictive analytics can be used to simulate the outcome of specific decisions and create strategies to maximize outcomes.
Alerts & Notifications are the watchdogs of analytics.  They provide a dependable and timely way to bring awareness to team members about important events, but are not distracted by smaller, less significant changes.  If properly implemented, managers will spend less time monitoring employees and more time addressing key issues.  Alerts & Notifications can be sent via email, dashboard widget or text message.

Why Predictive Analytics is Important

CAN was started in 2008 , to make predictive analytics applicable and accessible to businesses of almost any size.  We are working diligently because predictive analytics has the unique potential to allow executives to scale their decision making as organizations and decisions become increasingly more complex with ever thinner margins for error.  For example small businesses are now having to compete around the world as if they were multinational companies, and multinational companies are having to develop and deliver products and services to ever more fragmented consumers as if they were small businesses.
Introduction to Predictive Analytics
Predictive analytics is different than other Business Intelligence tools because it goes beyond visualizing data and human assumptions, instead it combines data, theory and math to make forecasts about the future using current and historical facts.  While executives and decision makers also analyze current and historical facts to make forecasts about the future, what separates executives from predictive mathematics is predictive analytics ability to find detailed relationships from hundreds of possible variables and millions of observations, and also produce an estimate of the error of the prediction.  Predictive analytics is able to tell you that a independent variables, e.g. males, has a .3% impact on a dependent variable with 95% confidence.  While executives and managers still have to make the final decisions, predictive mathematics can provide insight that isn’t possible with other business intelligence technologies.
A Brief History of Predictive Analytics
It wasn’t until the middle part of the last decade that we had the combination of mathematical techniques, data storage capacity, data processing power and data creation that we need to make predictive analytics accessible to businesses of all sizes.  The mathematical techniques have existed and improved since the founding of the Econometric Society in 1930.  The data storage capacity has been around since 1977 with Oracle’s commercialization of the relational database.  The processing power has existed since IBM commercialized business computing with the IBM 360.  SaaS and Social Media provided the final requirement, data creation.  Both of these technologies have made is common and inexpensive for people to quickly and easily collect and publish information about their lives and jobs.
The Limitation of Predictive Analytics
Predictive analytics is not without flaws and if people become over reliant or trusting of predictive models you can have disasters such as the subprime mortgage crisis.  To avoid hubris and ensure that our customers can trust our models, CAN has developed the philosophy of Less Wrong and the CAN Three-Way Test.
The philosophy of Less Wrong is that the goal of every model that we produce is to make our clients less wrong than they were, but not to assume that we will ever make our clients 100 percent right.  In business their are often clear winners with clear metrics such as profit keeping score.  However, no business is ever perfect, the winners are only Less Wrong than their competitors.  Also, business success and failure is only temporary.  The ability to help companies continually become less wrong is what attracted CAN to predictive analytics.  By combining data, theory and mathematics CAN helps develop predictive models to help our clients make decisions that are Less Wrong.
Our philosophy of Less Wrong has allowed us to develop business model that allows us to quickly and inexpensively provide results to our clients.  Similar to Software as a Service (SaaS) we provide Analytics as a Service on month-to-month contracts, and we use our ongoing relationships to continually help our clients becomes Less Wrong.  While we provide our clients with results within the first 30 days, we are continually improving and adapting our systems to an ever changing business environment.
While the philosophy of Less Wrong helps to establish reasonable goals and allow room for continual improvement, our models provide the foundation of our client’s business, and so we work hard to make sure that our models reflect reality so that they generate reasonable predictions.  One of the best ways that we do this is the CAN Three-way test.  The CAN Three-way test requires that each model we produce can be backed up with theory, data and math.

  1. The Theory: Without a sound theory, you have to rely on randomness, and randomness decreases the long-term usefulness of the model.  CAN relies on the expertise of our clients executives, managers and employees to build the theories around our models.
  2. The Data: CAN makes sure to fully understand your data, because data is the raw materials used to build predictive models.  CAN will examine patterns in your data to determine which equations to use to model your data, and also determine the quality of your data.  CAN is able work with imperfect data, we just make sure that we understand the flaws and limitations of your data, such as potential bias etc.
  3. The Math: CAN’s analysts go through hundreds of different models to select the right one that fits the data as well as the theory.  This doesn’t mean that we always select the equation that has the best line fit, but instead the equation that fits both the data and the theory.
Featured Posts – Click the Brain
Archives
CAN Jewels